These projects are then peer reviewed by a jury of architects and specialists in a process that includes review of submitted documentation, a public presentation to the jury and a visit to the project site. For those involved it is a rigorous but rewarding process.
To those outside the process, however, it may appear to be self-congratulatory and even nepotistic, with architects awarding accolades to their own. The reality is that jurors are carefully selected for their knowledge and experience and with close consideration of conflicts of interest. The process has been tested and refined over many years and includes numerous checks and balances.
Architects are also exacting critics of each other’s work. They critique from a highly educated standpoint and with an exacting eye for detail, noticing things that most clients, building occupants and casual passers-by generally don’t give a moment’s thought to: how a project provides excellent environmental performance while also capturing west-facing views; how a particular material has been used to achieve a well-resolved façade while responding to harsh site conditions and minimising construction waste; the manner in which complex and possibly conflicting brief requirements have been satisfied to deliver a solution that exceeds the client’s expectations. The criteria considered are as varied and specific as the projects, each of which is a prototype that will never be exactly replicated, even where prefabricated and modular construction is employed.
There may also be decisions that the community question considering the media attention and debate that some of the projects attract. This is a product of the complexity of construction projects, which is rarely fully understood or considered in these discussions.
A project may be deemed successful as a work of architecture, in that it responds innovatively to the client brief, delivers a high level of technical resolution, is designed and documented to achieve a high standard of construction, low operating costs, ease of maintenance and a long service life and creates an environment that is delightful and sustainable. This does not prevent the same project from being the subject of debate from other perspectives. These may include whether the brief was well resolved, whether the community supports the underlying premise for the project and personal preferences regarding aesthetics.
In addition to these considerations, an architect is not a free agent but is subject to direction from the client, as well as operating within technical, budgetary, regulatory and legal frameworks. And even within these constraints, architects are not always employed in a traditional capacity and may have limited or no input in a project once a certain stage – concept design, development approval, a percentage of documentation – has been achieved. Given all of this, awarding those projects that achieve a high level of resolution within this complex and constrained operating environment is merited.
Ultimately, the awards program recognises the excellence achieved in a highly varied range of contexts. Each project encapsulates the ideas and aspirations of its authors – client, architect, contractors, engineers… – and contributes to the public realm. We hope that you enjoy the beautiful projects that were successful in the 2018 SA Architecture Awards and also encourage you to look beyond the aesthetics to the other factors that make them worthy of an award.
2018 SA Architecture Award Winners
Urban Design
The Gavin Walkley Award for Urban Design
Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building (AHMS) by Lyons
Public Architecture
The Jack McConnell Award for Public Architecture
Adelaide Convention Centre Redevelopment: East by Woods Bagot
Award of Merit
The Playford Tennis Centre by JPE Design Studio
Commendation
Royal Adelaide Hospital by Silver Thomas Hanley DesignInc
Educational Architecture
The Dr John Mayfield Award for Educational Architecture
St John’s Grammar School John Bray Centre for Performing Arts by Walter Brooke
Award of Merit
Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building by Lyons
Commendation
Concordia College Nautilus Centre by Russell and Yelland
Commendation
Old Watulunga by Grieve Gillett Andersen
Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
The John S Chappel Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
PR House by Architects Ink
Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
Cedar House by JPE Design Studio
Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
Hyde Park Townhouses by Con Bastiras Architect
Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
Aldgate House by Wood Marsh Architecture
Commendation for Residential Architecture – Houses (New)
Tess and Michael’s House by Max Pritchard
Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations & Additions)
The John Schenk Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations & Additions)
Millswood House by studio-gram with Kate Russo
Award for Residential Architecture – Alterations & Additions
Bowden Bajko House by Davis and Davis Architects
Commendation for Residential Architecture – Alterations & Additions
Timberland by sw-architects
Commendation for Residential Architecture – Alterations & Additions
MH House by Architects Ink
Commendation for Residential Architecture – Alterations & Additions
JR House by Architects Ink
Residential Architecture – Multiple Housing
The Newell Platten Award for Residential Architecture – Multiple Housing
Ivy Apartments, WEST by Davis + Davis Architects
Commercial Architecture
The Keith Neighbour Award for Commercial Architecture
The Darling Building by Williams Burton Leopardi
Sustainable Architecture
The Derrick Kendrick Award for Sustainable Architecture
trop_pods@ robe by Troppo Architects
Award for Sustainable Architecture
The Darling Building by Williams Burton Leopardi
Commendation for Sustainable Architecture
Last Stand by BB Architects
Commendation for Sustainable Architecture
Royal Adelaide Hospital by Silver Thomas Hanley DesignInc
Commendation for Sustainable Architecture
Tess and Michael’s House by Max Pritchard Gunner Architects
Commendation for Sustainable Architecture
Timberland by sw-architects
Small Project Architecture
The Marjorie Simpson Award for Small Project Architecture
84 Halifax Street by Oxigen
Award for Small Project Architecture
trop_Pods@ Robe by Troppo Architects
Commendation for Small Project Architecture
Sturt Street Office Home by Taylor Buchtmann Architecture
Commendation for Small Project Architecture
Bird in Hand Block by sw-architects and Enoki
Commendation for Small Project Architecture
UniSA Mobile Art Architecture and Design Studio
School of Art Architecture and Design University of South Australia
Heritage
The David Saunders Award for Heritage
The Darling Building by Williams Burton Leopardi
Award for Heritage
Queen Adelaide Room by Swanbury Penglase
Interior Architecture
The Robert Dickson Award for Interior Architecture
GA House by Architects Ink
Award for for Interior Architecture
WBL Studio by Williams Burton Leopardi
Award for Interior Architecture
Royal Adelaide Hospital by Silver Thomas Hanley DesignInc
Commendation for Interior Architecture
Melt by studio-gram
Steel Architecture
COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture
Millswood House by studio-gram with Kate Russo
The City of Adelaide Prize
The City of Adelaide Prize
84 Halifax Street by Oxigen
The City of Adelaide Prize – Commendation
The Darling Building by Williams Burton Leopardi
The City of Adelaide Prize – Commendation
Queen Adelaide Room by Swanbury Penglase
Enduring Architecture
The Jack Cheesman Award for Enduring Architecture
Pritchard House 1990 by Max Pritchard
Sir James Irwin President’s Medal
Douglas Alexander, Flightpath Architects
South Australian Emerging Architect Prize
Alison McFadyen, Phillips/Pilkington Architects
architecture.com.au
Get the latest from The Adelaide Review in your inbox
Get the latest from The Adelaide Review in your inbox